Drug Resistance Updates
Volume 12, Issue 6 , Pages 141-147, December 2009

Azole-resistance in Aspergillus: Proposed nomenclature and breakpoints

  • Paul E. Verweij

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Susan J. Howard

      Affiliations

    • The National Aspergillosis Centre, The University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Willem J.G. Melchers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • David W. Denning

      Affiliations

    • The National Aspergillosis Centre, The University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: 2nd Floor Education & Research Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 161 291 5811; fax: +44 161 291 5806.

Received 18 April 2009; accepted 8 June 2009. published online 30 October 2009.

Abstract 

Reports of itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus have been more frequent since the millennium. Identifying azole resistance is critically method dependent; nevertheless reproducible methods, reflective of in vivo outcome, are now in routine use. Some isolates also have elevated MICs to posaconazole and voriconazole. Multiple mechanisms of resistance are now known to be responsible, with differing degrees of azole cross-resistance, including mutations in the Cyp51A gene at G54, L98+TR, G138, M220, G448. Establishing breakpoints for Aspergillus is probably impossible with clinical data alone for multiple reasons yet there is an urgent need to do so. We propose the following breakpoints for A. fumigatus complex using the proposed EUCAST susceptibility testing methodology: for itraconazole and voriconazole, <2mg/L (susceptible), 2mg/L (intermediate) and >2mg/L (resistant); for posaconazole, <0.25, 0.5 and >0.5mg/L respectively. We recognize that additional work will be needed to confirm these proposed breakpoints, including in vivo and clinical correlative responses. We also propose nomenclature for genotypic resistance, in the event an isolate is not cultured, typified by ITZgR, VCZgI, POSgR (G54W) indicating that the isolate has a G54W substitution with a corresponding phenotype of resistance to itraconazole and posaconazole and intermediate susceptibility to voriconazole.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1368-7646(09)00062-4

doi:10.1016/j.drup.2009.09.002

Drug Resistance Updates
Volume 12, Issue 6 , Pages 141-147, December 2009